attended the society for longitudinal lifecourse studies conference, five days of wellbeing workshops and not one mention of the marshmallow test. my first sighting of brilliant at the top of a likert scale, first hearing of generation zed. millenium falcon fights confidence intervalesque spaceships
finding the right variable is an art
a genealogical design
seven generations of data
america's family tree
the german socio-economic panel (soep):
we turned 40 this year, so yay
original sample (west (1984), former east (1990))
papi - pen and paper interviews
understanding society:
which are called proteomics, that's all i know about this
hilda:
indefinite life panel
it's a very big document, don't ever print it out
===
two dimensions of subjective wellbeing - eudamonic and hedonistic
arguably the most important page is our documentation page
read the role of over-sampling of the wealthy in the survey of consumer finances by arthur b kennickell
a dual-frame sample
because the wealthiest one percent of households is estimated to hold about a third of all household net worth, it is critical that the scf pay particular attention to that rarefied group
the area-probability (ap) sample is selected from a geographically based national frame..about two thirds of the ultimately completed cases derive from this sample
the sample specifically excludes people who are listed as being members of the forbes list of the 400 wealthiest people in the u.s.
non-response, which is differentially higher among the wealthy
about 98 percent of scf cases with at least us$ 5 million of net worth in 2004 derived from the list sample; more than 85 percent of cases with at least us$ 1 million of net worth and about 75 percent of the cases with at least us$ 500,000 dollars came from this sample
response rates decline with capital income and rise with age and with amounts of charitable contributions made
the scf devotes substantial time and money to dealing with cooperation problems among the wealthy
despite the large difference in the levels of wealth at the top of the wealth distribution under the two samples, the shares
of the wealthiest one percent are very similar - about one-third of the
total. but the standard errors are quite different - 5.1 under the ap
sample and 1.2 under the combined samples
read does employer competition improve working conditions? by trent thompson
lack of competition among employers depresses not only wages, but also non-wage aspects of employment such as working conditions
the non-wage effects of employer power
a census of mining employment and safety
i use czs instead of metropolitan statistical areas (msas) because msas, by definition, do not account for rural areas where the majority of mining operations tend to be located
higher labor market concentration is significantly associated with higher rates of workplace accidents (model a), illnesses (model b), injuries (model c), and deaths (model d), such that a 10 percent increase in concentration is associated with around a 2 percent increase in the incidence rates of all four outcomes
just as market power affords employer's the ability to depress wages, it also affords them the ability to debase working conditions. what is more, the effect of concentration on workplace safety appears to be many times larger than the effect on wages
9/26